[MMTK] Does MMTK support negative AMBER PHASE values?
Konrad Hinsen
hinsen at cnrs-orleans.fr
Fri Jun 1 07:51:25 UTC 2007
On 31.05.2007, at 15:18, Mark Williamson wrote:
> I think it has something to do with the following:
>
> a) MMTK/ForceFields/BondFF.py:addDihedralTerm()
>
> seems to have some form of checking for this situation:
> if dihedral > Numeric.pi:
> dihedral = dihedral - 2.*Numeric.pi
> and
> if phase < 0.:
> phase = phase + 2.*Numeric.pi
>
>
> but this function:
>
> b) MMTK/ForceFields/MMForceField.py:addDihedralTerm()
>
> does not. Using some crude print()s to debug this, I see that the b)
> function is being called. This same b) function is also called when
> using a Amber94ForceField forcefield. Should Amber94ForceField be
> function a) or should b) have a similar form of checking as a) ?
No, and no. Function b) is the only reasonable one for the Amber
force field - it just passes on the parameters to the C energy routines.
Function a) is part of a specialized force field implementation for
normal mode calculations. It modifies the Amber parameters to ensure
that whatever given input configuration becomes a local energy
minimum. The routine you are looking at is called when the force
field parameters are collected, and yet it examines the current
positions of the atoms - which makes sense only because they are not
supposed to change.
I just scanned the Amber parameter file and noticed that all the
dihedral phase angles are either 0 or 180 degrees. Very probably
nobody has ever tested different values, so there could well be a
problem that has gone unnoticed. Perhaps the same could be said about
the code in SANDER. I'll have to think about a suitable test case for
individual energy terms.
Konrad.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Konrad Hinsen
Centre de Biophysique Moléculaire, CNRS Orléans
Synchrotron Soleil - Division Expériences
Saint Aubin - BP 48
91192 Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France
Tel. +33-1 69 35 97 15
E-Mail: hinsen at cnrs-orleans.fr
---------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the mmtk
mailing list