[MMTK] Difference in number of Torsion parameters between MMTK and Leap
Konrad Hinsen
hinsen at cnrs-orleans.fr
Wed May 2 17:32:00 UTC 2007
On 02.05.2007, at 16:15, Mark Williamson wrote:
> Using the commands angle and bond I get the same number of terms as in
> the second part of the MMTK output (21 and 36), but the dihedrals
> output
> gives a different number 52 vs 32. This is the output from rdparm:
> (justified a little for readability)
I assume that "pk" is the force constant prefactor in the dihedral
terms. In 20 of the terms listed by RDPARAM, it is zero. These terms
are automatically discarded by MMTK. Both AMBER and MMTK thus have 32
non-zero dihedral energy terms, impropers included.
Note that there can be a difference between AMBER and MMTK in
improper dihedral terms. Their number should be the same, but their
atom orders (and thus values) can differ. The reason is that the
AMBER force field definition for impropers depends on one non-
physical parameter: the atom index.
For each group of four atoms that make up an improper dihedral term,
there are three possible definitions for the angle. Instead of using
an average of those three, which would be physically sound, AMBER
chooses one of them based on a criterion of alphabetical order of
atom types plus atom indices if the atom types are the same. As far
as I know, this detail is nowhere documented; one of the AMBER
developers explained it to me when I asked the question many years
ago. MMTK applies the same rule as AMBER, but the atom indexing in
MMTK and AMBER are in general not the same.
I don't see a simple fix for this, as the AMBER force field
definition is not physically reasonable. Energies should not depend
on the atom order in the PDB file.
Konrad.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Konrad Hinsen
Centre de Biophysique Moléculaire, CNRS Orléans
Synchrotron Soleil - Division Expériences
Saint Aubin - BP 48
91192 Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France
Tel. +33-1 69 35 97 15
E-Mail: hinsen at cnrs-orleans.fr
---------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the mmtk
mailing list