Atomdefinition for charged and uncharged Atoms
Ralph Gauges
Ralph.Gauges@EMBL-Heidelberg.de
Mon, 09 Nov 1998 10:01:42 +0100
Hi,
I am trying to set up a system which includes hem groups and I have
encountered the following problem. The mmtk package does not include an
atom definition of Fe. So I would like to try to define it myself, but
I have some questions beforehand. First, do the methods in the mmtk
module make a difference between charged and uncharged atoms? I assume
yes, because otherwise a lot would not make any sense. But if yes, then
where do the methods get the information about charged residues
from(like van-der-Waals radii)? Do I have to have a seperate set of
definition files for all the charged atoms, like one file for Fe, one
File for Fe2+ etc? What would a definition file for a charged atom look
like?
I guess, somebody else must have had a similar problem before and
probably posted it. Is there a way to read old posts from this mailing
list?
Thanks a lot
Ralph